AQUA HAN
Investor Prospectus · 01

Investor
Prospectus

AP Microeconomics Unit 3 Summative Project

A simulated entry into South Korea's perfectly competitive 500 mL bottled-water market

Market price
₩500 per bottle
Profit-maximizing output
97,000 bottles / month
Monthly accounting profit
₩12,582,753
Prepared by: Joseph Kang and Luke Lee
Instructor: Mr. Dillhoff
Seoul International School · 2026–2027
02
Investment overview

Executive Summary

Aqua Han is a proposed Hwaseong-based producer of affordable, label-free 500 mL bottled water. Modeled as a price-taking firm in perfect competition, the company maximizes profit by employing seven workers and producing 97,000 bottles per month at the market price of ₩500.

Market price
₩500 / bottle
Profit-maximizing output
97,000 bottles
Workers at optimum
7
Minimum ATC
₩357.71
Minimum AVC
₩308.70
Monthly accounting profit
≈ ₩12.58 million
Monthly economic profit
≈ ₩7.58 million
3-month accounting profit
≈ ₩37.75 million
3-month economic profit
≈ ₩22.75 million
Recommendation
Aqua Han should enter the market only if it can secure expected sales near ₩500 per bottle and sufficient demand for approximately 97,000 bottles per month. Under the model, the company earns positive accounting and economic profit at this price.
03

Company and Product

Aqua Han Pure Water is purified Korean drinking water sold in clear, label-free 500 mL PET bottles. Product information is placed through a QR code on the cap and outer packaging. The initial market consists of school cafeterias, offices, fitness centers, event organizers, small retailers, and convenience stores in Seoul and Gyeonggi.

Why this market approximates perfect competition

  • Many competing producers supply bottled water nationwide.
  • Highly standardized product: 500 mL of purified water is nearly identical across brands.
  • Consumers can easily compare prices online and in stores.
  • Individual small firms have very little control over the market price.
  • Aqua Han must accept the market price, it is a price taker.
  • Free entry and exit: firms enter when economic profit is available and exit when long-run losses persist.

Branding does create some real-world product differentiation (e.g., Jeju Samdasoo's volcanic-source image). This project nonetheless models Aqua Han as a price-taking firm in perfect competition.

04

Market and Competitors

Aqua Han is a price taker. The market sets the price, so for every bottle sold:

P = AR = MR = ₩500 Each additional bottle sold adds ₩500 to total revenue.
BrandProductSales indicatorPackage-price observationApprox. unit priceMarket position
Jeju Samdasoo500 mL bottled water≈ 40.4% market share₩22,800 for 40 bottles≈ ₩570Market leader
Icis 8.0500 mL bottled water≈ 12.6%–13% market share₩16,060 for 20 bottles≈ ₩803Major national competitor
Baeksansu500 mL bottled water≈ 7.4%–8.3% market share₩15,260 for 40 bottles≈ ₩382Value-oriented national competitor
Aqua Han500 mL label-free bottled waterNew market entrantTarget ₩10,000 for 20 bottles₩500Affordable regional entrant

Note: Market share is used as the most reliable publicly available sales indicator because audited brand-level unit sales are not consistently available. Online prices vary by retailer, shipping, package size, and promotion.

05

Location and Operating Assumptions

Aqua Han operates a simulated factory and warehouse in Hwaseong, Gyeonggi-do: approximately 353 m² (107 pyeong), monthly rent ₩3,000,000, security deposit ₩30,000,000. The Korean government start-up grant covers the deposit and most start-up equipment, so the deposit is not counted as a monthly cost.

Fixed cost itemMonthly amount
Factory rent₩3,000,000
Utilities & other fixed (20% of rent)₩600,000
Security deposit (grant-funded)₩0
Total fixed cost₩3,600,000
Utilities & other fixed = ₩3,000,000 × 0.20 = ₩600,000 Total fixed cost = ₩3,000,000 + ₩600,000 = ₩3,600,000 per month

Labor costs

ComponentRate₩ per hour
Base minimum wage₩10,320.00
National Pension Fund4.5%₩464.40
National Health Insurance3.545%₩365.84
Long-Term Care6.405%₩661.00
Employment Insurance1.1%₩113.52
Industrial Accident Insurance1%₩103.20
Total employer contributions16.55%₩1,707.96
Loaded hourly cost₩12,027.96
Monthly cost per worker (176 h)₩2,116,920.96
Contribution rate = 4.5% + 3.545% + 6.405% + 1.10% + 1.0% = 16.55% Loaded hourly cost = ₩10,320 × 1.1655 = ₩12,027.96 Hours: 8 h/day × 22 days = 176 h/month Monthly cost per worker = ₩12,027.96 × 176 = ₩2,116,920.96

Raw materials

Material component (per completed bottle)Cost
PET bottle, cap, purified water, sanitation, outer-case allocation (before waste)₩164.00
Required 10% waste and loss₩16.40
Effective raw-material cost per completed bottle₩180.40

This is a transparent simulation assumption for a small producer purchasing packaging in bulk.

06

Total Product Table and Total Product Curve

WorkersTotal product / monthMPL
00N/A
112,00012,000
228,00016,000
348,00020,000
466,00018,000
580,00014,000
690,00010,000
797,0007,000
8101,0004,000
9103,0002,000
Total Product Curve
020,00040,00060,00080,000100,0000123456789Number of workersMonthly output (bottles)Inflection: TP rises at a decreasing rate after worker 397,000 (7 workers)Total Product
Total Product
MPL = ΔTotal Product ÷ ΔLabor Since workers increase one at a time, MPL is the extra output produced by each additional worker.
07

Marginal Product of Labor

Marginal Product of Labor Curve
04,0008,00012,00016,00020,00024,000123456789Additional worker employedExtra bottles produced per monthDiminishing marginal returns begin after the third workerMax MPL = 20,000 (worker 3)
Marginal Product of Labor (MPL)

Specialization causes MPL to rise for the first three workers. After the third worker, the fixed factory space and bottling equipment become constraints. Additional workers still increase total production, but each adds less output than the previous worker. This demonstrates diminishing marginal returns.

08

Fixed, Variable, and Total Costs

Labor cost = Workers × ₩2,116,920.96 Raw materials = Total Product × ₩180.40 Variable cost = Labor + Raw materials Total cost = Fixed cost (₩3,600,000) + Variable cost Marginal cost = ΔTC ÷ ΔQ = ΔVC ÷ ΔQ AFC = FC ÷ Q AVC = VC ÷ Q ATC = TC ÷ Q
WorkersOutputFixed costLabor costMaterialsVariable costTotal costMC / bottle
00₩3,600,000₩0₩0₩0₩3,600,000N/A
112,000₩3,600,000₩2,116,921₩2,164,800₩4,281,721₩7,881,721₩356.81
228,000₩3,600,000₩4,233,842₩5,051,200₩9,285,042₩12,885,042₩312.71
348,000₩3,600,000₩6,350,763₩8,659,200₩15,009,963₩18,609,963₩286.25
466,000₩3,600,000₩8,467,684₩11,906,400₩20,374,084₩23,974,084₩298.01
580,000₩3,600,000₩10,584,605₩14,432,000₩25,016,605₩28,616,605₩331.61
690,000₩3,600,000₩12,701,526₩16,236,000₩28,937,526₩32,537,526₩392.09
797,000₩3,600,000₩14,818,447₩17,498,800₩32,317,247₩35,917,247₩482.82
8101,000₩3,600,000₩16,935,368₩18,220,400₩35,155,768₩38,755,768₩709.63
9103,000₩3,600,000₩19,052,289₩18,581,200₩37,633,489₩41,233,489₩1,238.86
WorkersOutputAFCAVCATCMC
112,000₩300.00₩356.81₩656.81₩356.81
228,000₩128.57₩331.61₩460.18₩312.71
348,000₩75.00₩312.71₩387.71₩286.25
466,000₩54.55₩308.70₩363.24₩298.01
580,000₩45.00₩312.71₩357.71₩331.61
690,000₩40.00₩321.53₩361.53₩392.09
797,000₩37.11₩333.17₩370.28₩482.82
8101,000₩35.64₩348.08₩383.72₩709.63
9103,000₩34.95₩365.37₩400.33₩1,238.86

Worked example: seven workers

Variable cost = (7 × ₩2,116,920.96) + (97,000 × ₩180.40) = ₩14,818,446.72 + ₩17,498,800.00 = ₩32,317,246.72 Total cost = ₩3,600,000 + ₩32,317,246.72 = ₩35,917,246.72
09

AFC, AVC, ATC, and MC Curves

Per-Unit Cost Curves for Aqua Han
₩0₩200₩400₩600₩800₩1,000₩1,2000102030405060708090100110Monthly output (thousands of bottles)Cost per bottle (₩)Min ATC ₩357.71 at 80,000Min AVC ₩308.70 at 66,000MCATCAVCAFC
AFCAVCATCMC

AFC falls continuously as the fixed ₩3.6 million is spread over more bottles. AVC and ATC are U-shaped because of increasing then diminishing marginal returns. MC falls while MPL rises, reaches its minimum at the third worker, then rises sharply and crosses AVC and ATC near their minimum points.

10

Minimum Average Total Cost

Minimum ATC
₩357.71
Output
80,000 bottles
Workers
5
ATC at 5 workers = ₩28,616,605 ÷ 80,000 = ₩357.71 per bottle AVC at 4 workers = ₩20,374,084 ÷ 66,000 = ₩308.70 per bottle

Minimum ATC is the company's long-run break-even price in this discrete production model: at any price below ₩357.71, Aqua Han cannot cover all of its costs. Minimum AVC (₩308.70 at 66,000 bottles with 4 workers) is the short-run shutdown price: below it, revenue cannot even cover variable cost.

11

Effect of a 20% Rent Increase

New rent = ₩3,000,000 × 1.20 = ₩3,600,000 Other fixed costs = ₩600,000 (unchanged) New total fixed = ₩3,600,000 + ₩600,000 = ₩4,200,000
Fixed-Cost Shock: Monthly Rent Increases by 20%
₩0₩200₩400₩600₩800₩1,000₩1,2000102030405060708090100110Monthly output (thousands of bottles)Cost per bottle (₩)ATC shifts upAFC shifts upMC unchanged
Original AFCNew AFCOriginal ATCNew ATCMC (unchanged)
  • AFC shifts upward (e.g., at 97,000 bottles: ₩37.11 → ₩43.30).
  • ATC shifts upward by the same amount (₩370.28 → ₩376.47 at 97,000).
  • AVC remains unchanged.
  • MC remains unchanged, rent is a fixed cost, so it does not change the cost of producing another bottle. The profit-maximizing quantity stays at 97,000.
12

Effect of a 10% Raw-Material Increase

New material cost = ₩180.40 × 1.10 = ₩198.44 per bottle Increase = ₩18.04 per bottle
Variable-Cost Shock: Raw Materials Increase by 10%
₩0₩200₩400₩600₩800₩1,000₩1,2000102030405060708090100110Monthly output (thousands of bottles)Cost per bottle (₩)ATC ↑ ₩18.04AVC ↑ ₩18.04MC ↑ ₩18.04
Original AVCNew AVCOriginal ATCNew ATCOriginal MCNew MC
  • AVC, ATC, and MC all shift upward.
  • AFC remains unchanged because fixed costs did not change.
  • Because the raw-material cost rises by a constant ₩18.04 per unit, each affected per-unit curve rises by approximately ₩18.04 (e.g., MC for worker 7: ₩482.82 → ₩500.86, still below MR = ₩500).
13

Market Supply, Demand, and Entry Decision

Competitive Market (stylized)
₩0₩200₩400₩600₩800₩1,000050100150200Market quantity (stylized index)Price per bottle (₩)E: Pₑ = ₩500QₑDS
Market Demand (D)Market Supply (S)Market price carried to firm
Representative Aqua Han Firm
₩0₩200₩400₩600₩800₩1,000020406080100Firm output (thousands of bottles / month)Price / cost per bottle (₩)P = MR = ₩500Entry threshold (min ATC) = ₩357.71Entry pushes P down
ATCMCP = MR = ₩500Entry threshold (min ATC)
  • In the long run, Aqua Han should enter when the expected market price is at least minimum ATC. Entry threshold = ₩357.71 per bottle.
  • At ₩500, price is above minimum ATC, so the firm can earn positive economic profit.
  • Positive economic profit attracts new firms into a perfectly competitive market over time.
  • Entry increases market supply (S shifts right) and places downward pressure on price until long-run economic profit approaches zero, near ₩357.71.

The market panel uses a clearly identified stylized quantity index because complete national quantity data are not available to the firm.

14

One-Month and Three-Month Profit

The assignment requests accounting profit but also asks for implicit costs. Because implicit costs are not part of accounting profit, both measures are presented.

Accounting profit = Total Revenue − Explicit Costs
Economic profit = Total Revenue − Explicit Costs − Implicit Costs
PeriodTotal revenueExplicit costAccounting profitImplicit costEconomic profit
One month₩48,500,000.00₩35,917,246.72₩12,582,753.28₩5,000,000.00₩7,582,753.28
Three months₩145,500,000.00₩107,751,740.16₩37,748,259.84₩15,000,000.00₩22,748,259.84
Total revenue = 97,000 × ₩500 = ₩48,500,000 Accounting profit = ₩48,500,000 − ₩35,917,246.72 = ₩12,582,753.28 Implicit cost = 2 founders × ₩2,500,000 forgone income = ₩5,000,000 Economic profit = ₩12,582,753.28 − ₩5,000,000 = ₩7,582,753.28
15

Profit-Maximizing Quantity

Profit Maximization: MR = MC at 97,000 Bottles
₩0₩200₩400₩600₩800₩1,000₩1,2000102030405060708090100110Monthly output (thousands of bottles)Cost per bottle (₩)P = D = AR = MR = ₩500Q* = 97,000Profit ≈ ₩129.72 / bottle × 97,000 ≈ ₩12,582,753ATC at Q* ≈ ₩370.28MC
MCAVCATCAccounting profitP = D = AR = MR

Discrete decision rule

Worker addedExtra bottlesMC for blockMRDecision
112,000₩356.81₩500Hire, raises profit
216,000₩312.71₩500Hire, raises profit
320,000₩286.25₩500Hire, raises profit
418,000₩298.01₩500Hire, raises profit
514,000₩331.61₩500Hire, raises profit
610,000₩392.09₩500Hire, raises profit
77,000₩482.82₩500Hire, raises profit
84,000₩709.63₩500Do not hire, lowers profit
92,000₩1,238.86₩500Do not hire, lowers profit
  • The seventh worker adds 7,000 bottles at MC ≈ ₩482.82. Since ₩482.82 < MR of ₩500, hiring worker 7 increases profit.
  • The eighth worker adds only 4,000 bottles at MC ≈ ₩709.63. Since ₩709.63 > ₩500, hiring worker 8 would decrease profit.
  • Therefore the profit-maximizing level is 97,000 bottles with seven workers.
ATC at 97,000 = ₩35,917,246.72 ÷ 97,000 ≈ ₩370.28 Profit per bottle = ₩500 − ₩370.28 ≈ ₩129.72 Total profit ≈ ₩129.72 × 97,000 ≈ ₩12,582,753
16

Profit, Loss, Break-Even, Shutdown, and Exit

1 · Economic Profit
₩0₩300₩600₩900050100Output (thousand bottles)₩ per bottleP = ₩500Positive Economic Profit
MCATCAVC
2 · Break-Even
₩0₩300₩600₩900050100Output (thousand bottles)₩ per bottleP = Minimum ATC ≈ ₩357.71Zero Economic ProfitBreak-Even Price
MCATCAVC
3 · Short-Run Shutdown
₩0₩300₩600₩900050100Output (thousand bottles)₩ per bottleShutdown Price = Minimum AVC≈ ₩308.70 at 66,000Example P = ₩300 < AVCCannot cover variable cost → shut down
MCATCAVC
Price conditionDecision
P > ATCEarn economic profit and produce where MR = MC
P = minimum ATCBreak even and earn zero economic profit
Minimum AVC < P < ATCProduce in the short run while accepting an economic loss
P = minimum AVCIndifferent between producing and shutting down
P < minimum AVCShut down in the short run
Price below ATC in the long runExit the market
Market-entry price
≥ ₩357.71
Break-even price
≈ ₩357.71
Shutdown price
≈ ₩308.70
Exit condition
LR price < min ATC
17

Risks and Controls

#RiskEffectResponse
1Price competitionLowers price and marginal revenueSecure B2B contracts and enter only above minimum ATC
2Packaging-cost inflationRaises AVC, ATC, and MCObtain multiple supplier bids and use lighter label-free packaging
3Rent increasesRaises AFC and ATCNegotiate a longer lease with capped increases
4Demand below 97,000 bottlesRaises ATC through underused capacityObtain staged purchase commitments before hiring the seventh worker
5Regulatory and food-safety complianceMay add fixed and variable costsBudget for water-quality testing, factory registration, and certification
6Simulation uncertaintyReal productivity and costs may differConduct a one-month pilot and replace assumptions with observed data
18

Sources and Method Notes

Research-based / externally observed
  • Factory location and rent benchmark (Hwaseong, Gyeonggi-do)
  • Competitor prices
  • Market-share estimates
  • Label-free packaging policy
Simulation assumptions
  • Aqua Han's ₩500 market price
  • Raw-material cost of ₩164 before waste
  • Production schedule and MPL
  • Forgone founder income (₩2.5M each)
  • Stylized market supply and demand quantities
19

Final Investment Recommendation

Invest, conditionally. At a market price of ₩500, Aqua Han maximizes profit with seven workers producing 97,000 bottles per month, earning approximately ₩12.58 million in monthly accounting profit and ₩7.58 million in economic profit. Price exceeds minimum ATC (₩357.71) by a comfortable margin, and the firm stays open in the short run at any price above ₩308.70.

Aqua Han should enter only after securing expected sales near ₩500 per bottle and demand commitments for roughly 97,000 bottles per month. Investors should expect economic profit to shrink over time as new entrants push the market price toward minimum ATC.

AQUA HAN